Pringle Quinn Anzano, P.C. » General & Commercial Litigation

PQA’S Airport Clients Awarded Judgments

admin — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:19:10 +0000

In 2008, PQA attorneys George D. McGill and Denise M. O’Hara obtained judgments on behalf of airport clients pursuant to the New Jersey Aircraft Lien Statute. PQA attorneys initially filed liens against aircraft owned by various individuals or entities for storage or maintenance fees owed to PQA’s clients. PQA attorneys then instituted court actions in connection with the liens. As part of the judgments awarded by the Court, PQA obtained for their clients the right to sell the aircraft at public auction in satisfaction of the liens. PQA attorneys proceeded to handle all aspects of the public auctions on behalf of their clients, including the transfers of aircraft registration with the Federal Aviation Administration.

PQA Successfully Resolves Business Dispute in Favor of Client

admin — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:18:09 +0000

In 2008, PQA attorneys Kenneth E. Pringle, John A. Haulenbeek, and Denise M. O’Hara resolved a bitter business dispute on behalf of their client. Upon learning that the client’s business partner had surreptitiously formed his own business to compete with the partnership business and was attempting to divert the partnership’s customers to the new business, PQA attorneys filed suit against the partner and his new business and obtained an injunction preventing the partner from operating his new business. By taking an aggressive approach at the outset of the case, PQA attorneys obtained a settlement favorable to the client in the early stages of the litigation, which resulted in minimal expenses incurred by the client.

PQA Negotiates Favorable Settlement for Client in Employment Matter

admin — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:17:20 +0000

Within a span of less than two months, PQA attorneys Kenneth E. Pringle and Denise M. O’Hara resolved a complicated employment matter on behalf of a client who had been sued by a former employer and fired from her job by a subsequent employer. After working for one company for twelve years, in early 2008 the client left to take a higher paying job at a second company. The first company claimed that the client breached a covenant not to compete and sued both the client and the second company that subsequently hired her. Upon being named in the suit, the second company immediately fired the client. The suit sought to impose harsh and unreasonable restrictions on the client’s ability to obtain employment, as well as to recover compensatory damages and punitive damages against the client. By taking an aggressive approach at the outset of the lawsuit, PQA attorneys were able to negotiate a favorable settlement that allowed the client to obtain employment with minimal restrictions and to resolve the matter without payment of any fees to the company for its alleged damages.